Foraging activity of africanized honeybees (Apis mellifera L.): A study of nectar and pollen resources on a temporal scale

Leandro Pereira Polatto; Valter Vieira Alves Junior; João Cloves Stanzani Dutra; José Chaud-Netto

doi:10.12741/ebrasilis.v12i1.821

Authors

Leandro Pereira Polatto Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2774-9092
Valter Vieira Alves Junior Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados
João Cloves Stanzani Dutra Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul
José Chaud-Netto Universidade Estadual Paulista

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12741/ebrasilis.v12i1.821

Keywords:

Dominant Species, Ecological Succession, Floral Abundance, Floral Resources, seasonality, Abundância Floral, Espécies Dominantes, Recursos Florais, Sucessão Ecológica, Sazonalidade

Abstract

Abstract. The spatial and temporal distribution of food resources, as well as the type, quantity, and quality of the foods stocked in the hive are the principal regulatory factors of the choice and intensity of floral resource harvesting by bees. We evaluated the annual foraging activity of Africanized honeybees Apis mellifera L. (Apidae) on the most abundant natural food resources available. Nineteen abundant plant species susceptible to foraging by bee communities in the interior of a secondary growth forest fragment with a transition physiognomy between Atlantic Forest and Cerradão vegetation were accompanied to estimate the intensity of floral resource collection by Africanized honeybees A. mellifera during the year. We determined the productivity of the flowers (the quality and quantity of nectar and/or pollen made available) and floral abundance (the quantities of flowers produced and the duration of flowering) of the 19 plant species selected. Africanized honeybees A. mellifera collected floral resources from 11 species. The intensities of visits per flower and per area of floral exposition were greater among plant species visited by Africanized honeybees when bee collecting behavior resulted in pollen transfer to the floral stigmas. It is estimated that 70.5% of all visits by Africanized honeybees A. mellifera individuals during the year in the study area occurred on Senegalia polyphylla (DC.) Britton & Rose (Fabaceae), Grazielia cf. dimorpholepis (Baker) R.M.King & H.Rob (Asteraceae), and Gouania cf. latifolia Reissek (Rhaminaceae); those visits demonstrated seasonal patterns, with peaks of activity between January and April. Weak foraging activity was observed in June and between June and November.

Atividade de forrageio de abelhas africanizadas (Apis mellifera L.): um estudo das fontes de néctar e pólen em uma escala temporal

Resumo. A distribuição espacial e temporal dos recursos alimentares, bem como o tipo, quantidade e qualidade do alimento estocado na colmeia são os principais fatores reguladores na escolha e intensidade da coleta dos recursos florais pelas abelhas. O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar a atividade anual de forrageio de abelhas africanizadas Apis mellifera L. (Apidae) nas fontes alimentares naturais mais abundantes. A coleta de dados foi realizada em 19 espécies vegetais abundantes e suscetíveis ao forrageio pela comunidade de abelhas no interior de um fragmento de floresta secundária com fisionomia em transição entre Mata Atlântica e Cerradão, durante um ano. Para estimar a intensidade de coleta de recursos florais pelas abelhas africanizadas A. mellifera, foi determinada a produtividade das flores (qualidade e quantidade do néctar e/ou pólen alocada nas flores) e a abundância (quantidade de flores e duração do florescimento) das 19 espécies vegetais selecionadas. As abelhas africanizadas A. mellifera coletaram recursos florais em 11 espécies vegetais. As intensidades de visitas por flor e áreas de exposição floral foram superior nas espécies de plantas que foram visitadas pelas abelhas africanizadas A. mellifera cujos comportamentos de coleta resultavam em transferência de pólen aos estigmas das flores. Estima-se que 70,5% de todas as visitas promovidas por A. mellifera africanizada no decorrer do ano na região de estudo ocorreram em Senegalia polyphylla (DC.) Britton & Rose (Fabaceae), Grazielia cf. dimorpholepis (Baker) R.M.King & H.Rob (Asteraceae), e Gouania cf. latifolia Reissek (Rhaminaceae), demonstrando, dessa forma, um padrão sazonal, com picos de atividade em janeiro, abril e agosto, respectivamente. Por outro lado, houve fraca atividade de forrageio em junho e entre setembro e novembro.

References

Abrol, D.P., 2012. Consequences of introduced honeybees upon native bee communities, p. 635-667. In: Abrol D.P. (Ed.). Pollination Biology: biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. London, Springer, 792 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1942-2_19.

Andena, S.R., L.R. Bego & M.R. Mechi, 2005. A Comunidade de abelhas (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) de uma

Aslan, C.E., C.T. Liang, B. Galindo, H. Kimberly & W. Topete, 2016. The role of honey bees as pollinators in natural areas. Natural Areas Journal, 36: 478-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3375/043.036.0413.

Bar

Beekman, M., A.L. Gilchrist, M. Duncan & D.J.T. Sumpter, 2007. What makes a honeybee scout? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61: 985-995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0331-9.

Boff, S., A.C. Araujo & A. Pott, 2013. Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) and flowers in natural forest patches of southern Pantanal. Biota Neotropica, 13: 46-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1676-06032013000400005.

Budowski, G., 1965. Distribution of tropical American rain forest species in the light of successional processes. Turrialba, 15: 40-42.

Carbonari, V., O. Malaspina, V.V. Alves Junior & L.P. Polatto, 2016. Variation in honey yield per hive of Africanized bees depending on the introducing time of young queens. Ci

Carbonari, V., L.P. Polatto & V.V. Alves-Junior, 2009. Evaluation of the impact on Pyrostegia venusta (Bignoniaceae) flowers due to nectar robbery by Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Sociobiology, 54: 373-382.

Dawson, B. & R.G. Trapp, 2003. Bioestat

D

Donkersley, P., G. Rhodes, R.W. Pickup, K.C. Jones, E.F. Power, G.A. Wright & K. Wilson, 2017. Nutritional composition of honey bee food stores vary with floral composition. Oecologia, 185: 749-761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3968-3.

Dornhaus, A. & L. Chittka, 2004. Why do honey bees dance? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55: 395-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0726-9.

Faegri, K. & L. Pijl, 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. London, Pergamon Press, 244 p.

Fewell, J.H. & M.L. Winston, 1992. Colony state and regulation of pollen foraging in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (L.). Behavior Ecology Sociobiology, 30: 387-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00176173.

Fournier, L., 1974. Un m

Free, J.B., 1980. A organiza

Frisch, K., 1967. The dance language and orientation of bees. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 566 p.

Gon

Gr

Haaland, C., R.E. Naisbit & L.F. Bersier, 2011. Sown wildflower strips for insect conservation: a review. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 4: 60-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00098.x.

Hegarty, E.E. & G. Caball

Hora, R.C. & J.J. Soares, 2002. Estrutura fitossociol

Inouye, D.W., 1980. The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology, 61: 1251-1253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1936841.

Kato, M., T. Matsuda & Z. Yamashita, 1952. Associative ecology of insects found in paddy field cultivated by various planning forms. Science Reports Tohoku University, IV (Biology), 19: 291-301.

Kato, M., A. Shibata, T. Yasui & H. Nagamasu, 1999. Impact of introduced honeybees, Apis mellifera, upon native bee communities in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Researches on Population Ecology, 41: 217-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s101440050025.

Kleinert, A.M.P., M. Ramalho, M. Cortopassi-Laurino, M.F. Ribeiro & V.L. Imperatriz-Fonseca, 2009. Abelhas sociais (Bombini, Apini, Meliponini), p. 371-424. In: Panizzi, A.R. & J.R.P. Parra (Eds.). Bioecologia e nutri

Koppler, K., G. Vorwohl & N. Koeniger, 2007. Comparison of pollen spectra collected by four different subspecies of the honey bee Apis mellifera. Apidologie, 38: 341-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2007020.

Pasquet, R.S., A. Peltier, M.B. Hufford, E. Oudin, J. Saulnier, L. Paul, J.T. Knudsen, H.R. Herren & P. Gepts, 2008. Long-distance pollen flow assessment through evaluation of pollinator foraging range suggests transgene escape distances. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105: 13456-13461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806040105.

Pedro, S.R.M. & J.M.F. Camargo, 1991. Interactions on floral resources between the Africanized honey bee Apis mellifera L and the native bee community (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in a natural

P

Polatto, L.P. & V.V. Alves-Jr., 2008. Utiliza

Polatto, L.P. & J. Chaud-Netto, 2013. Influence of Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) on the use of the most abundant and attractive floral resources in a plant community. Neotropical Entomology, 42: 576-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-013-0165-x.

Proctor, M., P. Yeo & A. Lack, 1996. The natural history of pollination. London, Harper Collins Publishers, 479 p.

Roubik, D.W., 1989. Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. New York, Cambridge University Press, 514 p.

Santos, F.M., C.A.L. Carvalho & R.F. Silva, 2004. Diversidade de abelhas (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) em uma

Seeley, T.D., 1989. Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony

Seeley, T.D., 1995. The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 295 p.

Sherman, G. & P.K. Visscher, 2002. Honeybee colonies achieve fitness through dancing. Nature, 419: 920-922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01127.

Smart, M.D., R.S. Cornman, D.D. Iwanowicz, M. Mcdermott-Kubeczko, J.S. Pettis, M.S. Spivak & C.R.V. Otto, 2017. A comparison of honey bee-collected pollen from working agricultural lands using light microscopy and ITS metabarcoding. Environmental Entomology, 46: 38-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvw159.

Taha, E.K.A., 2015. A study on nectar and pollen sources for honeybee, Apis mellifera L. in Al-Ahsa Saudi Arabia. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 3: 272-277.

Traveset, A. & D.M. Richardson, 2006. Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21: 208-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.006.

Vital, M.V.C., R. Hepburn, S. Radloff & S. Fuchs, 2012. Geographic distribution of Africanized honeybees (Apis mellifera) reflects niche characteristics of ancestral African subspecies. Brazilian Journal of Nature Conservation, 10: 184-190.

Vogel, S., 1990. History of the Malpighiaceae in the light of pollination ecology. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, 50: 130-142.

Wilms, W., V.L. Imperatriz-Fonseca & W. Engels, 1996. Resource partitioning between highly eusocial bee and possible impact of the introduced Africanized honey bee on native stingless bees in the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 31: 137-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/snfe.31.3.137.13336.

Zavattini, J.A., 1992. Din

Zavattini, J.A., 2009. As chuvas e as massas de ar no estado de Mato Grosso do Sul: estudos geogr